[Digikam-users] LightZone
Gerhard Kulzer
gerhardkgmx at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 06:12:37 GMT 2008
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 Paul Waldo wrote:
> On Monday 04 February 2008 4:21:16 pm Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > 2008/2/4, Paul Waldo <paul at waldoware.com>:
> > > On Sunday 03 February 2008 9:21:42 am michael hughes wrote:
> > > > I just downloaded and installed LightZone on Kubuntu and wondered if
> > >
> > > anyone
> > >
> > > > else has tried it. I think its very similar to Adobes Lightroom and has
> > > > lots of features which I find useful In particular the IPTC handling
> > >
> > > which
> > >
> > > > is streets ahead of digikam.
> > >
> > > I also am starting to give it a try. I haven't had a lot of time to work
> > > with
> > > it, but I think Digikam is far superior for image organization. In
> > > LightZone's favor is the ability to apply a transformation to a selected
> > > area. I think that it will be good to use as an external editor, just as
> > > gimp is. I look forward to hearing about your experiences with LZ.
> >
> > digiKam support 16 bits color depth image, gimp no...
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> My comment was by no means a diminishing of Digikam. I find the digikam tools
> work wonderfully for the majority of my photos. I especially like the B&W
> effects, for which gimp provides no equal. Most of my images are nails, and
> digikam is a great hammer. Sometimes though, I have a screwy image, so I
> need a screwdriver :-). In these cases gimp or krita fit the bill. Digikam
> lets me use the tool that works best, to its credit.
>
> I used to use KPhotoAlbum, but switched to Digikam because it works so much
> better for me. I'm still not done retagging my tens of thousands of images,
> but I feel that it is worth it because of the utility of digikam. So please
> don't take my comments negatively, I have the utmost respect for the work
> that you and everyone else has done! Please keep up the good work!
>
> Paul
> ______
Hi Paul,
if you're tagging your whole collection you might be interested in reading this:
http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=DigikamDAM
It will be in the documentation very soon.
Gerhard
--
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20080205/399866ca/attachment.sig>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list