[Digikam-users] IPTC handling and limits

Jay Dickon Glanville dickon.glanville at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 18:06:59 BST 2007

On 9/12/07, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/9/12, Thomas Hummel <hummel at pasteur.fr>:
> >   . does it make sense to have a digikam tag representing the picture
> location
> >     since it will be saved in the keyword header, instead of in the maybe
> more
> >     appropriate location IPTC header ?
>  What do you mean by picture _location_ ?

I think what Thomas is asking is, does it make sense to use a
tag/keyword to denote the pictures location when there is a field
specific to location in the IPTC specification?

Just my interpretation.
Jay Dickon Glanville

More information about the Digikam-users mailing list