[Digikam-users] Digikam SIGSEGV with Kodak DX3700
Chris G
cl at isbd.net
Sun Apr 29 17:29:29 BST 2007
I'm trying to download pictures from a Kodak DX3700 and not having
much success.
I put the camera in its USB cradle and tell Digikam to download and it
thinks for quite a while and then crashes.
The backtrace from digikam is:-
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1249884448 (LWP 22967)]
[KCrash handler]
#5 0x0000026a in ?? ()
#6 0xb7dc5806 in Digikam::CameraUI::slotConnected ()
from /opt/kde/lib/libdigikam.so.0
#7 0xb7dd3d11 in Digikam::CameraUI::qt_invoke ()
from /opt/kde/lib/libdigikam.so.0
#8 0xb68cad44 in QObject::activate_signal ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#9 0xb68cae8f in QObject::activate_signal_bool ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#10 0xb7dd96a4 in Digikam::CameraController::signalConnected ()
from /opt/kde/lib/libdigikam.so.0
#11 0xb7de477e in Digikam::CameraController::customEvent ()
from /opt/kde/lib/libdigikam.so.0
#12 0xb68c81df in QObject::event () from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#13 0xb686623f in QApplication::internalNotify ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#14 0xb68663dc in QApplication::notify () from
/usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#15 0xb6eb1ac5 in KApplication::notify () from
/opt/kde/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#16 0xb68672f0 in QApplication::sendPostedEvents ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#17 0xb6867384 in QApplication::sendPostedEvents ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#18 0xb6811ea6 in QEventLoop::processEvents ()
from /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#19 0xb687c961 in QEventLoop::enterLoop () from
/usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#20 0xb687c8b6 in QEventLoop::exec () from
/usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#21 0xb686539f in QApplication::exec () from
/usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#22 0x0804a3bf in main ()
In the terminal window which I ran digikam from it says:-
KCrash: Application 'digikam' crashing...
digikam: Failed to initialize camera!
digikam: Libgphoto2 error: Bad parameters (-2)
This is digikam 0.9.0-rc2, will getting the latest version be likely
to fix this?
--
Chris Green
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list