[Digikam-users] Fwd: Re: IPCT Keywords and Tags

[Gilles Caulier]

On Friday 24 November 2006 08:18, ARVE wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:59:10 +0100
>
> Caspar Maessen wrote:
> > Op donderdag 23 november 2006 23:26, schreef Arve:
> > > > Question : Bibblepro remove Exif markernote, or you
> >
> >have process
> >
> > > > something wrong with your pictures ?
> > >
> > > BibblePro don't manage to transfere makernote to the
> >
> >processed file
> >
> > Well, I'm learning to use BibblePro 4.9d. The above
> >remarks made me
> > curious, because I didn't notice such a loss before. To
> >make sure, I
> > processed a jpeg-file in BibblePro and loaded it into
> >digiKam. All the
> > information EXIF, Makernote and IPTC is preserved.
> >
> >
> > Caspar.
> > --
> > Als de perceptie over de feiten regeert, wordt de
> >beheersing van
> > risico's impulsief, sele ctief en 'cosmetisch'.  --René
> >van Swaaningen
> > (citaat Alert, 2006)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> What camera do you use?
>  
> If I remember right makernote and several tags used in EXIF is not exactly
> standard and Bibble have some issues with EXIF info on some cameras. 
> Arve

Yes, some camera use non-standard Exif tags to place exotic values...

...but Makernote Exif tag (not tags) are placed in a standard way. Of course 
Makernotes tags are un-standardized.

Look like Makernotes is a standardized Exif subfolder witch a content 
unstandardized.

Gilles

>