Bump min Qt version

Anjani Kumar anjanik012 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 16 08:05:22 BST 2021


Hello,

This should be fine I guess, https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/commit/0a1fd2c60ec38707f0e2dfeabf6ebb45a01f9382. Let me know.
Thanks,
Anjani

On Jun 16 2021, at 11:23 am, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using digikam_globasl.h with a preprocessor definition as QT_ENDL depending of Qt version can be a solution.
>
> Gilles
>
> Le mer. 16 juin 2021 à 07:41, Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com (mailto:metzpinguin at gmail.com)> a écrit :
> > It's all correct with the Qt version check. My only thought was whether we
> > could find another option for Qt::endl, as there would be a lot of Qt version
> > checks.
> >
> > Maik
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021, 23:09:28 CEST schrieb Anjani Kumar:
> > > What should I do? Keep doing this or not?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Anjani
> > >
> > > On Jun 16 2021, at 2:23 am, Anjani Kumar <anjanik012 at gmail.com (mailto:anjanik012 at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > Something like this
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #if (QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(5, 14, 0))
> > > >
> > > > QStringList tagsList = hierarchy.split(QLatin1Char('/'),
> > > > Qt::SkipEmptyParts);
> > > >
> > > > #else
> > > >
> > > > QStringList tagsList = hierarchy.split(QLatin1Char('/'),
> > > > QString::SkipEmptyParts);
> > > >
> > > > #endif
> > > > I haven't pushed it yet though.
> > > >
> > > > On Jun 16 2021, at 2:19 am, Anjani Kumar <anjanik012 at gmail.com (mailto:anjanik012 at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > I already started this pre-processor branching. Not for Qt::endl but I
> > > > > have done it for QString::split() which is also present from Qt 5.14.> >
> > > > > On Jun 16 2021, at 2:16 am, Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com (mailto:metzpinguin at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > > But we already have a problem with Qt::endl, this only exists with
> > > > > > Qt-5.14. We should find another way of doing this than with
> > > > > > pre-processeur branching. Maybe define a macro.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maik
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021, 13:55:53 CEST schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No. We need to be compatible at least with Qt 5.12 LTS.
> > > > > > > Please make pre-processeur branching in source code by checking Qt
> > > > > > > version,
> > > > > > > as it already do in other place in digiKam.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > exemple :
> > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/core/app/date/
> > > > > > > ddatepic ker.cpp#L547
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gilles Caulier
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le mar. 15 juin 2021 à 13:52, Anjani Kumar <anjanik012 at gmail.com (mailto:anjanik012 at gmail.com)> a
> > écrit :
> > > > > > > > The recent changes to
> > > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/gsoc21-qt6-port
> > > > > > > > makes it
> > > > > > > > compile only on newer Qt versions. So I it should be best Bump Qt
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > to 5.15.2. Should I make the change?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Anjani
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20210616/c11d8d4a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list