Digikam 7.2-RC Segfault, no bt

Maik Qualmann metzpinguin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 21:08:43 GMT 2021


Do not start the AppImage with gdb, but with the debug option.

digiKam.appimage -debug 

Maik

Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021, 21:38:50 CET schrieb Michael Moore:
> I just noticed that when I start digiKam, gdb says "No debugging symbols
> found in /usr/local/bin/digiKam-7.2.0-rc-x86-64-debug.appimage" - is that
> what it should say?
> 
> --
> Michael
> 
> stuporglue at mtv:~$ rm /tmp/digikam.log; export
> QT_LOGGING_RULES="digikam*=true"; gdb
> /usr/local/bin/digiKam-7.2.0-rc-x86-64-debug.appimage 2>&1 | tee
> /tmp/digikam.log
> GNU gdb (Debian 10.1-1.7) 10.1.90.20210103-git
> Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> 
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
> Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
> Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
>     <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
> 
> For help, type "help".
> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
> Reading symbols from
> /usr/local/bin/digiKam-7.2.0-rc-x86-64-debug.appimage...
> (No debugging symbols found in
> /usr/local/bin/digiKam-7.2.0-rc-x86-64-debug.appimage)
> (gdb)
> 
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:17 PM Michael Moore <stuporglue at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Gilles,
> > 
> > Same workflow, still no backtrace.
> > 
> > I had accepted a lot of face tag suggestions, in small and large batches.
> > I think I had about 50 photos selected this time and clicked the Accept
> > checkbox and after processing about 1/3 of them, it closed.
> > 
> > It had been open for several hours before I ran this latest batch, but I'm
> > sure it has crashed quickly before too.
> > 
> > Here's the last bit of output:
> > 
> > Digikam::MetadataHub::writeTags: -------------------------- New Keywords
> > ("Sophie Moore")
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::setIptcKeywords:
> > "/Volumes/Photos/2010/10/11/DSC_4337.JPG"  ==> New Iptc Keywords: 
> > ("Sophie
> > Moore")
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::save: MetaEngine::metadataWritingMode 1
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::save: Will write XMP sidecar for file "DSC_4337.JPG"
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::Private::saveOperations: wroteComment:  false
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::Private::saveOperations: wroteEXIF:  true
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::Private::saveOperations: wroteIPTC:  true
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::Private::saveOperations: wroteXMP:  true
> > Digikam::MetaEngine::save: Metadata for file "DSC_4337.JPG" written to XMP
> > sidecar.
> > Digikam::ItemScanner::commit: Scanning took 402 ms
> > Digikam::ItemScanner::~ItemScanner: Finishing took 1 ms
> > Digikam::DImg::load: "/Volumes/Photos/2010/10/11/DSC_4337.JPG" : "JPEG"
> > file identified
> > unknown: Start of Image  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Miscellaneous marker 0xe1, length 65532  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Miscellaneous marker 0xe2, length 1318  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Define Quantization Table 0  precision 0  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Define Quantization Table 1  precision 0  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Start Of Frame 0xc0: width=4288, height=2848, components=3  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 1: 2hx1v q=0  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 2: 1hx1v q=1  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 3: 1hx1v q=1  ( 1 )
> > unknown: Define Huffman Table 0x00  ( 1 )
> > unknown:           0   1   5   1   1   1   1   1  ( 2 )
> > unknown:           1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0  ( 2 )
> > unknown: Define Huffman Table 0x10  ( 1 )
> > unknown:           0   2   1   3   3   2   4   3  ( 2 )
> > unknown:           5   5   4   4   0   0   1 125  ( 2 )
> > unknown: Define Huffman Table 0x01  ( 1 )
> > unknown:           0   3   1   1   1   1   1   1  ( 2 )
> > unknown:           1   1   1   0   0   0   0   0  ( 2 )
> > unknown: Define Huffman Table 0x11  ( 1 )
> > unknown:           0   2   1   2   4   4   3   4  ( 2 )
> > unknown:           7   5   4   4   0   1   2 119  ( 2 )
> > unknown: Start Of Scan: 3 components  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 1: dc=0 ac=0  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 2: dc=1 ac=1  ( 1 )
> > unknown:     Component 3: dc=1 ac=1  ( 1 )
> > unknown:   Ss=0, Se=63, Ah=0, Al=0  ( 1 )
> > Digikam::ItemScanner::commit: Scanning took 14 ms
> > Digikam::ItemScanner::~ItemScanner: Finishing took 1 ms
> > /tmp/.mount_digika0c11vX/AppRun: line 166: 869836 Segmentation fault
> > 
> >  digikam $@
> > 
> > [Inferior 1 (process 869821) exited with code 0213]
> > (gdb) bt
> > No stack.
> > (gdb)
> > 
> > 
> > Here's how I'm running it:
> > 
> > stuporglue at mtv:~$ rm /tmp/digikam.log; export
> > QT_LOGGING_RULES="digikam*=true"; gdb digikam 2>&1 | tee /tmp/digikam.log
> > 
> > digikam is symlinked to the debug appimage.
> > 
> > stuporglue at mtv:~$ ls -l /usr/local/bin/digikam
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Feb 24 08:06 /usr/local/bin/digikam ->
> > digiKam-7.2.0-rc-x86-64-debug.appimage
> > 
> > --
> > Michael Moore
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 7:55 AM Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
> > 
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> As I can see you run the AppImage version.
> >> 
> >> You need to use the heavy debug version of appimage, which include all
> >> debug symbols. Run the bundle in gdb with the debug argument as usual.
> >> Now when it crash you will see a debug backtrace if GDB can capture
> >> this.
> >> 
> >> Best
> >> 
> >> Gilles Caulier
> >> 
> >> Le mer. 24 févr. 2021 à 14:51, Michael Moore <stuporglue at gmail.com> a
> >> 
> >> écrit :
> >> > Hello,
> >> > 
> >> > I'm running the 7.2-RC appimage on Debian Bullseye, with an external
> >> 
> >> MySQL database. The external MySQL database is hosted on the same
> >> machine,
> >> and is version 5.6.30-1, installed from the Debian repositories.
> >> 
> >> > I'm doing a lot of face recognition (200,000+ photos) and am getting
> >> 
> >> intermittent crashes. But it seems that there's no backtrace.
> >> 
> >> > I haven't been able to nail down a specific workflow that is guaranteed
> >> 
> >> to generate a crash yet.
> >> 
> >> > Tasks I'm usually doing when it crashes are: Running "Recognize Faces",
> >> 
> >> Selecting images in the People pages, Accepting or Rejecting selections.
> >> Crashes usually happen when there are many tasks in the Active Process
> >> list.>> 
> >> > For example, if I have selected 100-300 images and click "Confirm that
> >> 
> >> the selected person is shown here", it sometimes crashes while processing
> >> them. Or sometimes it crashes when running Recognize Faces. Or when
> >> switching to a Person tag with many (1000s) of images.
> >> 
> >> > I have Digikam writing tags to sidecar files.
> >> > 
> >> > I ran it inside GDB this last time, and the final few lines were
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Digikam::ItemQueryBuilder::buildQueryFromXml: " ( (
> >> 
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR (
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR (
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR (
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) ) "
> >> 
> >> > Digikam::ItemLister::listImageTagPropertySearch: Search query:
> >> >  "SELECT DISTINCT Images.id, Images.name, Images.album,
> >> 
> >> Albums.albumRoot,        ImageInformation.rating, Images.category,
> >> ImageInformation.format, ImageInformation.creationDate,
> >> Images.modificationDate, Images.fileSize,        ImageInformation.width,
> >> ImageInformation.height,        ImageTagProperties.value,
> >> ImageTagProperties.property, ImageTagProperties.tagid  FROM Images
> >> INNER JOIN ImageTagProperties ON ImageTagProperties.imageid=Images.id
> >> 
> >>   LEFT JOIN ImageInformation ON Images.id=ImageInformation.imageid
> >> 
> >> INNER JOIN Albums           ON Albums.id=Images.album WHERE
> >> Images.status=1
> >> AND (  ( ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN
> >> (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=? 
> >> )
> >> OR ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT
> >> id
> >> FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR (
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) OR (
> >> (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id
> >> FROM
> >> TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?  ) )  );"
> >> 
> >> >  (QVariant(int, 160), QVariant(int, 160), QVariant(QString,
> >> 
> >> "autodetectedPerson"), QVariant(int, 160), QVariant(int, 160),
> >> QVariant(QString, "autodetectedFace"), QVariant(int, 160), QVariant(int,
> >> 160), QVariant(QString, "ignoredFace"), QVariant(int, 160), QVariant(int,
> >> 160), QVariant(QString, "tagRegion"))
> >> 
> >> > Digikam::ItemLister::listImageTagPropertySearch: Search result: 3
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::cancel: Cancel Main Thread
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::slotJobFinished: One job is done
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::cancel: Cancel Main Thread
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::setMaximumNumberOfThreads: Using  4  CPU
> >> 
> >> core to run threads
> >> 
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::run: Action Thread run  1  new jobs
> >> > Digikam::ItemMarkerTiler::slotSourceModelReset: ----
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::slotJobFinished: One job is done
> >> > Digikam::ActionThreadBase::cancel: Cancel Main Thread
> >> > /tmp/.mount_digika6BSWUo/AppRun: line 166: 840681 Segmentation fault
> >> > 
> >>   digikam $@
> >>   
> >> > [Inferior 1 (process 840666) exited with code 0213]
> >> > (gdb) bt
> >> > No stack.
> >> > (gdb)
> >> > 
> >> > Is there anything else I can do to try to provide something useful in a
> >> 
> >> bug report? Right now it seems far too vague to be helpful in tracking
> >> down
> >> the problem.
> >> 
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Michael Moore






More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list