Regarding Implementation for Ignored Faces

[Kartik Ramesh]

Yes, I believe Ignored should be a separate property as well. So I
implemented it, so that ignored faces are stored with the property
"ignoredFace" instead of "tagRegion" (as in the case of Confirmed Faces).
However, even though the Tags are being correctly marked as Ignored (I
checked the .db files), the View isn't showing any faces in the Ignored
category. I believe this is because the model doesn't understand how to
interpret this new "ignored" property. I would really appreciate some help
regarding this issue.

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:45 PM woenx <marcpalaus at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Kartik,
>
> Just my two cents. Yes, I agree that the "Ignore" feature should only
> appear
> in the "Unknown" faces category. I believe that, when given the option to
> accept or reject a face/suggestion in digikam, if the face is in
> "Unconfirmed" because it already has a suggestion, rejecting it should send
> it back to "Unknown", and doing the same a face in "Unknown" should send
> them to "Ignored" (or "Hidden", or whatever word you think it fits better).
>
> Regarding the second issue, I can't really say. I believe the "Ignored"
> should be a category in itself (like Unknown and Unconfirmed) and not just
> a
> tag (wouldn't that interfere with the face recognition algorithm?), but the
> developers will probably give better advice on this.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-devel-f1695701.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20200513/0ac82116/attachment-0001.htm>