Digikam 6.1 compile on Fedora 30 (rawhide), GCC 9.0.1

[Maik Qualmann]

2. https://commits.kde.org/digikam/b80f503b7fa8be056c4ffc435babecc9612e32a9

Maik

Am Samstag, 23. März 2019, 19:43:36 CET schrieben Sie:
> 1. https://commits.kde.org/digikam/9a6b85d564258b5f097fa504aa49d2c5e859128e
> 
> Maik
> 
> Am Samstag, 23. März 2019, 18:49:13 CET schrieb Rob Dueckman:
> > Here is a link to the output.
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Y5dletBjBpYsiiMnounMSUbOgYScO9ce
> > Rob
> > 
> > On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks for this report.
> > > I already seen the test tool failure from CI server... We will
> > > investigate.
> > > 
> > > Can you provide a full compilation trace please ?
> > > 
> > > Best
> > > 
> > > Gilles Caulier
> > > 
> > > Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 20:29, Rob Dueckman <duke at dukey.org> a écrit :
> > > > For fun, I decided I would try building Digikam 6.1 under Fedora 30
> > > > Rawhide and GCC 9.0.1.
> > > > Other then getting may warnings for implicit declarations, the code
> > > > 
> > > > compiles and only fails three tests:
> > > >  24 - applytagstest (Failed) 32 - printmetadatatest (Failed) 33 -
> > > > 
> > > > printiteminfotest (Failed)
> > > > I'm not sure exactly what code is being tested with these tests as
> > > > I didn't see anything on my quick look at the code.  I am guessing
> > > > the errors are related to the Exiv2 which has been bumped to v0.27.
> > > > While it's not critical to get this working, I thought I would
> > > > share my early results.
> > > > Rob


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20190323/9c100d7c/attachment.html>