No subject

stabilized, and all lead developpement will be done in GMic script
interface.

About Blur stuff, i don't know yet. I would to use another code, more
simple and faster, as Mostfet one from libkimageeffect2 archive fro
example...

Gilles

2010/11/12 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>:
> Ah ok so we are going to remove CImg? If so, we could remove the blur effect
> anyway, without using the compile flag now...?
>
>
> Andi Clemens
> -----------------
> www.digikam.org
>
> On Friday 12 November 2010 22:31:23 Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> because, we don't control it.
>>
>> CImg is a large libs. blur is a simple effect. It's more easy to
>> maintain our code.
>>
>> I imported CImg only for greystoration feature, which is a very
>> complex algorithm. Since One year this code have been moved to another
>> library named GMic. Why ? To provide a script framework.
>>
>> http://gmic.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> The problem is that all is broken now with CImg. This lib has
>> progressed but is not compatible since 1.3.1.
>>
>> CImg 1.3.0, imported in digiKam core is pretty old now. The solution
>> is to use CMig now. I started this job, but it's complex and long
>> job...
>>
>> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/gmicport.patch.gz
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2010/11/12 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>:
>> > I used CImg because it is nearly 20 times faster.
>> > Why implement such algorithmns on our own if there are ready-to-use, well
>> > known and tested libraries :-) ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Andi Clemens
>> > -----------------
>> > www.digikam.org
>> >
>> > On Friday 12 November 2010 18:53:57 Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
>> >> > SVN commit 1196146 by cgilles:
>> >> >
>> >> > Andy, this is not understadable.
>> >> > All CImg::*blur() method crash under MacOsX. and i don't know why...
>> >> > Probably, this is fixed with last CImg 1.4.x release, as digiKam still
>> >> > use 1.3.0... but we cannot update because all Greystoration algorithm
>> >> > have been removed from CImg and migrated to GMic library The solution
>> >> > is to port greystoration code to GMic, as it have been recommended by
>> >> > CImg author in the past by a private mail. But it's a long and
>> >> > complex task. Note : Greystoration tools do not crash under MAC Os X
>> >> > !!! I'm lost... So, I restore old gaussian blur algorithm for Mac
>> >> > only...
>> >>
>> >> What is the advantage of generally using the CImg variant instead of our
>> >> own code? Do they produce different results?
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> >> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Digikam-devel mailing list
>> > Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>