No subject

in 0.9.3, backported from KDE4. So the question is 0.9.5 or not ? Andi,
Marcel ?

Note : inot 0.9.5, there still few stuff to implement to polish new feature,
especially in editor with EditorTool component. This is also true for
KDE4...

Gilles Caulier



2008/10/14 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>

> Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
> > 2008/10/14 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
> >
> >> Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>
> >> > Why ? 0.9.4 release do not compile with libkdcraw 0.1.6 ?
> >>
> >> No, it does not.
> >>
> >
> > Strange. it must. let's me see compilation trace please...
>
>
> Simple.  libkdcraw-0.1.6 dropped dcrawbinary.h, which is referenced all
> over
> the place in digikam-0.9.4 source.  digikam kde3 branch cvs has many
> commits ~4 weeks ago of this being fixed (#ifdefs for different libkdcraw
> versions).
>
> -- Rex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>

------=_Part_86252_4803356.1224329924301
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir="ltr">Right. Of course, current implementation for KDE3 from svn (next 0.9.5) fix this problem already.<br><br>But i'm shared between to continue to maintain KDE3 version and to work only on KDE4... This require a lots of time.<br>
<br>Make KDE3 version compilable with libkdcraw 0.1.6 is important. Perhaps packagers can only apply your patch as well against 0.9.4, for the moment ? Achim and other, please let's me hear...<br><br>From developpers point, of course there are a lots of new stuff implemented in 0.9.3, backported from KDE4. So the question is 0.9.5 or not ? Andi, Marcel ?<br>
<br>Note : inot 0.9.5, there still few stuff to implement to polish new feature, especially in editor with EditorTool component. This is also true for KDE4...<br><br>Gilles Caulier<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2008/10/14 Rex Dieter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdieter at math.unl.edu">rdieter at math.unl.edu</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>
<br>
> 2008/10/14 Rex Dieter <<a href="mailto:rdieter at math.unl.edu">rdieter at math.unl.edu</a>><br>
><br>
>> Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > Why ? 0.9.4 release do not compile with libkdcraw 0.1.6 ?<br>
>><br>
>> No, it does not.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Strange. it must. let's me see compilation trace please...<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>Simple.  libkdcraw-0.1.6 dropped dcrawbinary.h, which is referenced all over<br>
the place in digikam-0.9.4 source.  digikam kde3 branch cvs has many<br>
commits ~4 weeks ago of this being fixed (#ifdefs for different libkdcraw<br>
versions).<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
-- Rex<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-devel at kde.org">Digikam-devel at kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

------=_Part_86252_4803356.1224329924301--