Database separation for similarity searches

[Mario Frank]

Hey Gilles,

I got the code working finally, yesterday evening. It now compiles but
the similarity db is not yet initialised correctly on startup.

There were far more changes and extensions necessary than I expected. So
far about the current status.

Mario


Am 22.01.2018 um 19:51 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Hi Mario,
>
> for digiKam 6.0.0 definitively. I sync the branch with master step by
> step. It's fine to merge db-sep branch to 6.0.0 branch that i created
> 2 week ago.
>
> Gilles
>
> 2018-01-22 16:55 GMT+01:00 Mario Frank <mafrank at uni-potsdam.de
> <mailto:mafrank at uni-potsdam.de>>:
>
>     Hey Gilles,
>
>     I looked at the code yesterday and it is not yet finished. I will
>     apply some changes to improve performance and report on it before
>     committing.
>
>     For which release is the db separation planned? 5.9 or 6.0?
>
>     Best
>
>     Mario
>
>
>     Am 06.01.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mario Frank:
>>     Hey Gilles,
>>
>>     I think she was not completely finished. I will have time for
>>     digiKam again after this weekend. I will take a look. I've got
>>     unfinished work anyway.
>>
>>     Cheers
>>     Mario
>>
>>     Am 6. Januar 2018 16:16:37 MEZ schrieb Gilles Caulier
>>     <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>
>>         Note : with this commit, i sync this branch with master
>>         without conflict.
>>
>>         https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d8511b14fd3e9c3406357858f557bdefa03d1551
>>         <https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d8511b14fd3e9c3406357858f557bdefa03d1551>
>>
>>         Gilles
>>
>>         2018-01-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier
>>         <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>             Hi all,
>>
>>             This summer, Swaty has work on database separation for
>>             similarity searches. The goal was to separate the fuzzy
>>             fingerprints storage from core DB to a dedicated DB. This
>>             will simplify the backup and prevent to overload the core
>>             DB with large data by image (around 500 bytes by
>>             fingerprints)
>>
>>             The work is not completed as i know. All have be done
>>             in origin/gsoc17-db-sep branch from git repository.
>>
>>             What's the status of this code exactly ? Can we continue
>>             with this implementation, or it will be better to
>>             re-start this work from scratch ?
>>
>>             The DB separation is important for the future. Thank sin
>>             advance for your feedback.
>>
>>             Best
>>
>>             Gilles
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9
>>     Mail gesendet. 
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20180125/ecfbec35/attachment.html>