Choice field for camera make and model?

[Gilles Caulier]

yes sure, no problem

Gilles

2017-11-30 13:18 GMT+01:00 Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com>:

> I hope I can play again this evening. ((:-)) On my computer, the
> motherboard is dead, with no previous signs. Have spare, give me time to
> look at what I then upgrade.
>
> Maik
>
> Am 30.11.2017 10:09 schrieb "Gilles Caulier" <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>
>> I just recompiled whole digiKam code with Qt 5.6.3. I see the change with
>> lens search feature. It's a great improvement.
>>
>> Yes you proposal with make and model sound fine for me.
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2017-11-27 7:54 GMT+01:00 Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Gilles,
>>>
>>> Look in this closed bug 228015. In the advanced search we now have the
>>> possibility to search for a specific or several lenses. The same choice
>>> field
>>> filled with data from the DB I would also suggest for camera make and
>>> model.
>>> Currently a free text field.
>>>
>>> Maik
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 26. November 2017, 22:28:10 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier:
>>> > Hi Maik,
>>> >
>>> > If i understand, the question is about to provide a free text field to
>>> > search camera lens model in database. Right ?
>>> >
>>> > I don't have objection. The search will provide a result with best
>>> similar
>>> > strings found in database. As Lens string identification is a puzzle to
>>> > extract form metadata while DB registration, i cannot see a better way
>>> to
>>> > process).
>>> >
>>> > Note : more than one lens can be found by Exiv2 for same ID from
>>> makernotes.
>>> >
>>> > Gilles Caulier
>>> >
>>> > 2017-11-26 22:13 GMT+01:00 Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com>:
>>> > > Gilles,
>>> > >
>>> > > I added the lens search as a choice field. What would you think if
>>> we use
>>> > > the
>>> > > free text fields for camera make and model as a choice field (data
>>> from
>>> > > DB)?
>>> > >
>>> > > Maik
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20171130/92f5c621/attachment.html>