[digikam] [Bug 375560] interruptable BQM
bugzilla_noreply at kde.org
bugzilla_noreply at kde.org
Thu Jan 26 08:42:47 GMT 2017
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375560
--- Comment #2 from Info at Axel-Krebs.de ---
Gilles:
I still run digiKam 5.4, you showed me download of:
digiKam-5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage.
- Maybe resulting from this circumstances, I can _NOT_ start bug reports
from within the digiKam program automatically. So additional information
might by not processed.
Panorama still does not work but hangs with message
- [digikam] [Bug 374812] Panorama stops
- see attachment.
----------------
"Workslow" ( :-) :
- with digiKam, I only process jpg's; typical sites some 15 MB each in
average.
- my PC has 16 GB RAM.
- processing BQM in parallel with image editor- only a few times. Is
unpractical slow!
- looks like digiKam occupies alles resources whil only using single
CPU's. Don't know, how to eluciate this in detail, unfortunately.
- how can I send you some pics? My eMail ist too slow by far.
Am 25.01.2017 um 22:28 schrieb bugzilla_noreply at kde.org:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375560
>
> caulier.gilles at gmail.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |caulier.gilles at gmail.com
> Component|general |BatchQueueManager
>
> --- Comment #1 from caulier.gilles at gmail.com ---
> Wow. Ten hours to process 40 36Mpx images... Incredible.
>
> Do you process RAW files ?
>
> How many RAM do you have ?
>
> Do you process items in parallel with BQM ?
>
> In all case, i have similar image size here (panorama), and more, and this do
> not take this time to process. My computer : i7-3Ghz, 32Gb RAM.
>
> If you share some items through the cloud, i can try to reproduce your workflow
> to compare.
>
> Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list