[Digikam-devel] Review Request 119201: Be explicit with OpenCV components
Vadim Zhukov
persgray at gmail.com
Sat Jul 19 20:33:32 BST 2014
> On Июль 10, 2014, 1:30 д.п., Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Ok, interresting. I'm waiting your final investiguation to apply these OpenCV rules
>
> Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> So with 4.1.0 the libkface picked up everything anyway. Something really fishy happens here. Still investigating...
>
> Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Some progress here ?
>
> Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Not yet, sorry; I had some troubles during geting back home to Moscow and just arranged them. I plan to finish my investigations at the weekend.
It looks like I got all pieces of puzzle right now. Because the actual problem is a complex one, I'm moving discussion to an ports at openbsd.org mailing list, CC'ing you as you'll likely be interested in the whole picture anyway. If you're against this, I'll duplicate critical parts here.
- Vadim
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119201/#review62024
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Июль 9, 2014, 9:26 п.п., Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119201/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Июль 9, 2014, 9:26 п.п.)
>
>
> Review request for Digikam.
>
>
> Repository: digikam
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This makes Digikam being explicit in what OpenCV components are needed. This results in less number of libraries to be linked to. As a result, Digikam starts a bit faster, eats a bit less memory and makes downstream (packagers) a bit more happy. Also it helps in cases when OpenCV package is split (for example, with non-free components separated) - without explicit mentioning of what components are needed, it's not clear will Digikam link to some components or not.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CMakeLists.txt d591a2f
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119201/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> OpenBSD/i386-CURRENT, KDE 4.11.5+Digikam 3.x and KDE 4.13.2+Digikam 4.x
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vadim Zhukov
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20140719/0c48faa3/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list