[Digikam-devel] [digikam] [Bug 306282] Improvements for maintenance tool
axel.krebs at t-online.de
Sun Jul 28 12:24:10 BST 2013
--- Comment #3 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
Dear Gillier, dear Marcel:
the more I think about, the more I believe: a huge step forward!!
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: [digikam] [Bug 306282] Improvements for maintenance tool
Datum: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:46:04 +0000
Von: Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de>
Antwort an: bug-control at bugs.kde.org
An: axel.krebs at t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
Gilles (& Marcel):
Thank you these large amount of information.
As much as I understand, we can expect a serious improvement in V 3.3- I
am keen on it!
Last time, my thumbnail is growing to more than 12 GB, and most probably
related to this fact, startinge tim of my digiKam V. 3.2 is rising to
some twenty minutes!!!
One obstacle seem to be clear: the max cpu percentage does _not_ exceed
25% which mean under quadcore, that digiKam does _not_ use my machine
In many motherboards, the OS can force the graphic chip to support the
cpu. Do you intend to achieve this in future?
Besides, the database concept of digiKam seems to limit many features of
the program itself.
There would are many causes to "attach" metadata to some expternal file,
as xml could be. If one starts to look for a selected directory,
all xml-files would be loaded instantaneously- no huge and potentially
risky database- files had to be loads at all.
Belonging to one picture, all derived version of a specific pic could be
treated as one single entity, meaning, that versioning of pics would
Tagging, face detection could be incorporated into this single metadata
There are many other advantages as
- independence of storage location of directories,
- minimized starting up time
- keeping together pics, versioneing and metadata at selected locations
What do you think about?
digiKam version 3.2.0
Gesamtzahl der Einträge: 238084
thumbnail db: 12,3 GB
starting up time: 27 min!!!
Am 28.07.2013 10:24, schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> changed:
> What |Removed |Added
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
> Version Fixed In| |3.3.0
> Resolution|--- |FIXED
> Latest Commit| |http://commits.kde.org/digi
> | |kam/62125c25374b0caf2d6a381
> | |2d1d34812ede8a6fd
> --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> ---
> Git commit 62125c25374b0caf2d6a3812d1d34812ede8a6fd by Gilles Caulier.
> Committed on 28/07/2013 at 08:00.
> Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'.
> Maintenance Manager : complete rewrite of maintenance tools handling.
> Instead to use signal provided by tool to know if job is done, use progress
> manager signal.
> Store instance of each tools in d private container instead stack to provide a
> better check of stage under progress.
> Patch ScanController to provide a better feedback to NewItemsFinder, in all
> scan mode. Add a new method to only call core code to perform
> scan WITHOUT to show a progress dialog. In fact progress manager as already all
> in place to give user feedback about progress...
> Patch FaceManagement maintenance tool to indicate that face are detected and
> Move status progress bar with ProgresManager code, as this one is fully
> Marcel, I would to drop fully DProgressDialog code, which is only used now to
> ScanController, with all first run step to collect all information from image
> managed by database. I remember that in 2.x serie, you have patched digiKam to
> only perform first run scan in background when albumgui is show. I'm right ?
> At now, this feature sound fonctionnal some time, but it's not fully
> If you take a look how Google Picasa work, you will see that main DB
> referencing run in background when main GUI is displayed. A progress indication
> is show in statusbar.
> User can start to work with collected items in real time and don't need to wait
> a long time that all referencing is done through a small progress dialog...
> Look this entry for ex : 320359.
> What do you think about?
> Related: bug 295256, bug 320121, bug 295255, bug 297614
> CCMAIL: marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de
> FIXED-IN: 3.3.0
> M +1 -1 CMakeLists.txt
> M +19 -7 digikam/database/scancontroller.cpp
> M +7 -0 digikam/database/scancontroller.h
> M +1 -1 libs/progressmanager/progressmanager.cpp
> R +1 -0 libs/progressmanager/statusprogressbar.cpp [from:
> libs/widgets/common/statusprogressbar.cpp - 098% similarity]
> R +1 -0 libs/progressmanager/statusprogressbar.h [from:
> libs/widgets/common/statusprogressbar.h - 096% similarity]
> M +2 -3 utilities/maintenance/duplicatesfinder.cpp
> M +1 -1 utilities/maintenance/facedetector.cpp
> M +1 -2 utilities/maintenance/fingerprintsgenerator.cpp
> M +1 -1 utilities/maintenance/maintenancedlg.cpp
> M +117 -77 utilities/maintenance/maintenancemngr.cpp
> M +14 -8 utilities/maintenance/maintenancemngr.h
> M +3 -1 utilities/maintenance/maintenancetool.cpp
> M +24 -20 utilities/maintenance/newitemsfinder.cpp
> M +0 -1 utilities/maintenance/newitemsfinder.h
> M +1 -2 utilities/maintenance/thumbsgenerator.cpp
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Digikam-devel