[Digikam-devel] Review Request 111021: In case of multiple matches for a lens from lensfun, check if one is an exact match.

[Teemu Rytilahti]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111021/#review35922
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ping?

- Teemu Rytilahti


On June 14, 2013, 1:58 p.m., Teemu Rytilahti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111021/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 14, 2013, 1:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Digikam and Gilles Caulier.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In case lensfun returns multiple lenses, check if we have an exact match.
> Lensfun seems to return all the "matching" revisions of the lens (marked f.ex. with II or R) even though there is an exact match for the lens available.
> This fix allows one hopefully to run bqm for photos with those cases.
> 
> Might fix also 303848.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303848.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303848
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libs/dimg/filters/lens/lensfuniface.cpp 55eeccae091ad260cae6e2a6a9929f2c405f8471 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested locally to work with "OLYMPUS M.14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II", for which lensfun also returns "OLYMPUS M.14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R".
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Teemu Rytilahti
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20130713/0f2654ba/attachment.html>