[Digikam-devel] Review Request 108382: Make tagging more accessible by keyboard

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 08:52:04 GMT 2013

Hi Martin,

I will be more pragmatic : why review board is a separated tool than
bugzilla. It must be merged to bugzilla...

We work exclusively with bugzilla to try to do the best about AQ. Add
another way to fix problems will increase complexity of developer workflow
and history. It just my experience of large projects that i manage in my


2013/1/13 Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek at gmail.com>

> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> well, typically, we prefer to use bugzilla to manage patches. We
>> use rarely reviewboard
>> Personalty, i think review board is a duplicate of bugzilla. With
>> bugzilla, we can do all reviewboard feature plus more, as version
>> management, etc... Why 2 management project tools... It more complex
>> workflow.
>> But it's just my viewpoint...
> The main advantage of ReviewBoard over Bugzilla is the ability to comment
> on code directly and cleanly, for example look at this review request -
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103117/ - scroll down a bit and there's
> gray bar saying "Dario Freddi" - expand it and you will see Dario's
> comments plus my replies, all very clear and traceable. It also supports
> patch revisions so you can see only the changes between two diffs if you
> want. All in all, it's more comfortable way of reviewing patches. But of
> course, use whatever suits you best :)
> Cheers
> --
> Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20130114/86f90f0f/attachment.html>

More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list