[Digikam-devel] bug 179209:proposed patch

[Gilles Caulier]

to propose a patch in a bugzilla entry is fine for me.

There is also KDE reviewboard, but personaltly it's increase complexity to
manage bug report. Instead to have one tool to control, we have two one...
As time is limited to switch from one to another one, and as bugzilla is
the most important tool to handle, there is no need to create a entry in RB
if a bugzilla entry already exist.

The only advantage of reviewboard is for patch where no bugzilla entry
exist yet..

About your patch, you drop the properties of album checked to see if it's
in collection or not. With certain KIPI host it will work, for some other
no...

Also, BatchProcessImages tools, are progressively replaced by BQM in
digiKam. In the future, this plugin will be dropped.

In fact, you will see that a similar entry already exist to BQM (:=))). If
something must be do, it's in BQM, not in kipi tool.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196894

Gilles Caulier


2013/4/2 Saurabh Patel <saurabhpatel7717 at gmail.com>

> Hello,
>   I submitted a patch for bug at foll. link:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179209
>
> Plz review it.
> Also is it right way to submit a patch or there is some other by which it
> is to be done
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20130403/b3e2c889/attachment.html>