[Digikam-devel] [Bug 305382] editing RAW gives artefacts with Bilinear quality

Axel Krebs axel.krebs at t-online.de
Sat Oct 27 15:15:22 BST 2012


https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305382

--- Comment #17 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
Hello Gilles,

Thank you for all these trouble shootings. I follow all these bug
remarks with huge interest. But I am still wondering, whom do you talk
to, as you address to Marcel (whose emailaddress I don't see) and to me,
you don't talk to appearently.

As I mentioned before, I can not contribute in software development, as
much as I liked too. I do not even understand the last steps you were
approaching the problem.

The only thing which comes into my mind (as I am European Quality
Manager and this discipline should offer some options even to software
development):

1.) I would try rigous standardization, the less differences the better.
American often say "keep it simple".

2.) I believe KDE is highly developped, but risky for complexity
reasons. Every engineer could build a car, basicly. In reality, you need
hundreds. I suspect KDEs technologies to still creep on a base level,
somehow.

3.) One of the reasons of the tremendeous success of MACS is based on
clear programming rules for developpers, if they want to be accpted by
Masintoshes.
- Why not use some of these rules?
- Why not defining borders within software has to be if incorporated
into the digiKam project? I could imagine, that undoubtful definition
(as tif-format, e.g.) could help to stabilize digiKam overall. Use, what
is defined, reject what is undefined.

Sorry, some thoughts of a non-programmer...

Coming back to your question mark. Please let me know, if I can help you
and the digiKam project.


Axel

(P.S.: "Axel" _not_ "Alex")

Am 27.10.2012 14:47, schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305382
> 
> --- Comment #15 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> ---
> Created attachment 74829
>   --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=74829&action=edit
> stand alone libraw tarball, based on cmake build system
> 
> To be sure sure sure, especially to see if host KDE env is the problem, i
> created a stand alone tarball of libraw 0.15.0-beta1 with cmake compilation
> script, which do not create a SHARED or STATIC lib.
> 
> The problem still the same....
> 
> So excepted a bug in libraw, i don't have any more idea to hack....
> 
> Alex ?
> 
> Gilles Caulier
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list