[Digikam-devel] [Bug 298160] add undo functionality for face tagging operations

[harsh agrawal]

Cool Axel!

I have started to have a look at it. Might take some time as I am not a
regular developer for Digikam, rather I have just started. Will talk with
other people and work on it.

I though cannot guarantee that when will I be able to finish implementing
this feature.

Maybe Aniket and I can together work on it.

Thanks
Harsh.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> wrote:

> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
>
> --- Comment #7 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
> Hi,
>
> this is perfect. Besides: what is "urgent" for my purposes, maybe
> neglectible for other. I rely in digiKam "organizing comittee" to set
> priorities what is important or not- I can never oversee all demands.
>
>
> Axel
>
>
> Am 15.04.2012 22:24, schrieb Aniket:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Aniket <atneik at gmail.com> ---
> > Hi Alex!
> >
> > I get your requirement. I could work on it but not before next week, will
> > that be too late? As you mentioned this to be urgent.
> > On Apr 16, 2012 1:31 AM, "Axel Krebs" <axel.krebs at t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
> >>
> >> --- Comment #2 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
> >> Hi Harsh:
> >>
> >> I´ll try to...
> >>
> >> First time, I did check my pics collection to recognize faces some days
> >> ago.
> >>
> >> This exploring phase took more than one day...
> >>
> >> The program found some hundreds of potential "faces" (or even
> >> structures) potentially similiar to faces.
> >>
> >> Sometimes, I did mistakes in acepting or rejecting faces.
> >>
> >> Of course, digikam offers an option re-check again. But this is
> >> time-consuming. And there is no certanity to click right if "face" or
> >> "not face", the second time…
> >>
> >> My thought is to keep some clicks in spare, so one can correct a click,
> >> if necessary. This is, the idea of UNDO, basically.
> >>
> >> I´m no programmer, unfortunately. And I could imagine, there should be
> >> several different solution pathes.
> >>
> >> Maybe just some type of cache, collecting the last ten or twenty clicks,
> >> and, if necessary, just UNDO the last one.
> >>
> >> thuiese "clicks" could be organized in a subsequent series of events,
> >> the newewst one replacing the one before
> >>
> >> n     ->     n-1 (newest)
> >> n-1     ->     n-2
> >> n-2     ->     n-2
> >> n-3     ->     n-2
> >>
> >> ...    ->    ...
> >>
> >> n-19     ->     n-20 8oldest, just one step before erasing)
> >>
> >> hope I could make my idea somewaht clearer?
> >>
> >> Thank you for taking care of!!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Axel
> >> ---
> >> Am 15.04.2012 21:21, schrieb Harsh Agrawal:
> >>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
> >>>
> >>> --- Comment #1 from Harsh Agrawal <dexter.1691 at gmail.com> ---
> >>> I would like to work on it. Can you please provide some more details of
> >> the
> >>> undo functionality you want.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Harsh
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Marcel Wiesweg <
> marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
> >>>>
> >>>> Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de> changed:
> >>>>
> >>>>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>            Summary|Urgent need for UNDO        |add undo functionality
> >> for
> >>>>                   |                            |face tagging
> operations
> >>>>           Severity|normal                      |wishlist
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You are receiving this mail because:
> >>>> You are the assignee for the bug.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You are receiving this mail because:
> >> You are the assignee for the bug.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>
> >
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20120416/2ddd7568/attachment.html>