[Digikam-devel] [Bug 298160] add undo functionality for face tagging operations

[Axel Krebs]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160

--- Comment #6 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
One click equals one decision accepting (naming) an automatically
recognized face; or not accepting (rejecting).

So "one click" is synonym with one decicion, or one conscious contribution.

hope this is clearer, now?

Axel

Am 15.04.2012 22:08, schrieb Harsh Agrawal:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
> 
> --- Comment #3 from Harsh Agrawal <dexter.1691 at gmail.com> ---
> One doubt, what do you mean by clicks here?
> 
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> wrote:
> 
>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
>>
>> --- Comment #2 from Axel Krebs <axel.krebs at t-online.de> ---
>> Hi Harsh:
>>
>> I´ll try to...
>>
>> First time, I did check my pics collection to recognize faces some days
>> ago.
>>
>> This exploring phase took more than one day...
>>
>> The program found some hundreds of potential "faces" (or even
>> structures) potentially similiar to faces.
>>
>> Sometimes, I did mistakes in acepting or rejecting faces.
>>
>> Of course, digikam offers an option re-check again. But this is
>> time-consuming. And there is no certanity to click right if "face" or
>> "not face", the second time…
>>
>> My thought is to keep some clicks in spare, so one can correct a click,
>> if necessary. This is, the idea of UNDO, basically.
>>
>> I´m no programmer, unfortunately. And I could imagine, there should be
>> several different solution pathes.
>>
>> Maybe just some type of cache, collecting the last ten or twenty clicks,
>> and, if necessary, just UNDO the last one.
>>
>> thuiese "clicks" could be organized in a subsequent series of events,
>> the newewst one replacing the one before
>>
>> n     ->     n-1 (newest)
>> n-1     ->     n-2
>> n-2     ->     n-2
>> n-3     ->     n-2
>>
>> ...    ->    ...
>>
>> n-19     ->     n-20 8oldest, just one step before erasing)
>>
>> hope I could make my idea somewaht clearer?
>>
>> Thank you for taking care of!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Axel
>> ---
>> Am 15.04.2012 21:21, schrieb Harsh Agrawal:
>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
>>>
>>> --- Comment #1 from Harsh Agrawal <dexter.1691 at gmail.com> ---
>>> I would like to work on it. Can you please provide some more details of
>> the
>>> undo functionality you want.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Harsh
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298160
>>>>
>>>> Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de> changed:
>>>>
>>>>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>>>>
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>            Summary|Urgent need for UNDO        |add undo functionality
>> for
>>>>                   |                            |face tagging operations
>>>>           Severity|normal                      |wishlist
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You are receiving this mail because:
>>>> You are the assignee for the bug.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You are receiving this mail because:
>> You are the assignee for the bug.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.