[Digikam-devel] Re: how to use git as subversion

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 09:22:09 GMT 2011


And i can confirm. I removed all local git repository, and checkout
again whole digikam SC. NEWS file still not changed in KDE Git !

WHY ???

Gilles

2011/2/7 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> Incredible :
>
> I just remove some empty line to end of NEWS file from digiKam core,
> just to test to commit...
>
> i use this alias : git config --global alias.ci "commit -a"
>
> Now i want to record my change to KDE repository:
>
> [gilles at localhost core]$ git ci
>
> [2.0 10b7c43] update
>  Committer: Gilles Caulier <gilles at localhost.localdomain>
> Your name and email address were configured automatically based
> on your username and hostname. Please check that they are accurate.
> You can suppress this message by setting them explicitly:
>
>    git config --global user.name "Your Name"
>    git config --global user.email you at example.com
>
> If the identity used for this commit is wrong, you can fix it with:
>
>    git commit --amend --author='Your Name <you at example.com>'
>
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> [gilles at localhost core]$ git push
> Warning: Permanently added 'git.kde.org,195.135.221.71' (RSA) to the
> list of known hosts.
> Everything up-to-date
> [gilles at localhost core]$ git status
> # On branch 2.0
> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/development/2.0' by 1 commit.
> #
> nothing to commit (working directory clean)
>
> The question is : file is really committed ? the message is not clear
> for me. If i take a look into Git web interface, it's not committed :
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/repository/revisions/master/changes/NEWS
>
> What's wrong here ?
>
> Gilles
>
> 2011/2/7 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>> This doen't work really.
>>
>> From digikam core, i removed AUTHOR file as well (rm -f AUTHOR)
>>
>> [gilles at localhost core]$ git status
>> # On branch 2.0
>> # Changed but not updated:
>> #   (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
>> #   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
>> #
>> #       deleted:    AUTHORS
>> #
>> no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
>> [gilles at localhost core]$
>>
>> and :
>>
>> [gilles at localhost core]$ git checkout
>> D       AUTHORS
>>
>> but AUTHOR file still not there. git doen't work as subversion.... why ?
>>
>> As you said, you must be more explicit with git :
>>
>> [gilles at localhost core]$ git checkout AUTHORS
>> [gilles at localhost core]$ ls
>> AUTHORS    CMakeLists.txt          COPYING.DOC  databaseserver/
>> digikam.lsm.cmake  imageplugins/  libs/         NEWS      README.FACE
>> themedesigner/  TODO.FACE       utilities/
>> ChangeLog  config-digikam.h.cmake  COPYING.LIB  DESIGN
>> Doxyfile.cmake     INSTALL        Mainpage.dox  project/  showfoto/
>> tips            TODO.MYSQLPORT
>> cmake/     COPYING                 data/        digikam/
>> HACKING            kioslave/      Messages.sh*  README    tests/
>> TODO            TODO.QTSCRIPT
>> [gilles at localhost core]$
>>
>> In this case, file is restored... but it's not user friendly...
>> yes, i'm from old school, but why it's always complex for simple task ?
>>
>> And also, why if i ask to update local copy with remote repository, it
>> refuse to restore the missing file, as subversion do ? I use alias set
>> by git config --global alias.up "pull --rebase"
>>
>> This way to work with this SCM is not logic for me, so far...
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2011/2/7 Gert Kello <gert.kello at gmail.com>:
>>>> Just to see, remove a versionned file in local, and try to restore it
>>>> from remote repository. Good luck...
>>>
>>> git checkout <filename>
>>> or
>>> git checkout -- <filename>
>>>
>>> I thought they are should behave differently, but at the moment I'm
>>> not able to find the difference
>>>
>>> I'm kind of newbie with git also, and I know it is frustrating if You
>>> can't figure out how to perform a simple svn operation with git. Now,
>>> after a month or so, I start to think that git might be a nice system
>>> actually.
>>>
>>> Gert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>
>>
>



More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list