[Digikam-devel] Re: Current svn of libkface does not compile for me

[Gilles Caulier]

Alex,

[gilles at localhost libface]$ make
[  5%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/LibFaceUtils.cpp.o
[ 11%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/FaceDetect.cpp.o
[ 16%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/Face.cpp.o
[ 22%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/Eigenfaces.cpp.o
[ 27%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/LibFace.cpp.o
[ 33%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/face.dir/Haarcascades.cpp.o
Linking CXX shared library libface.so
[ 33%] Built target face
[ 38%] Building CXX object
examples/CMakeFiles/FaceDetectionExample.dir/FaceDetection.cpp.o
Linking CXX executable FaceDetectionExample
[ 38%] Built target FaceDetectionExample
[ 44%] Building CXX object
examples/CMakeFiles/RandomTestsExample.dir/RandomTests.cpp.o
Linking CXX executable RandomTestsExample
CMakeFiles/RandomTestsExample.dir/RandomTests.cpp.o: In function
`main':
/mnt/data/Devel/SVN/branches/libface/examples/RandomTests.cpp:63:
undefined reference to `libface::LibFace::count(int) const'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [examples/RandomTestsExample] Error 1
make[1]: *** [examples/CMakeFiles/RandomTestsExample.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Test program do not link fine...

Gilles

2010/10/28 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>:
> I have changed the return parameter from update function. I will revert to previous version.
>
>
> Alex
>
> On 28 Oct 2010, at 09:48, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
>> libkface must be compiled against libface from trunk (currently 0.1 release)
>>
>> We plan to include right libface code as well in libkface to prevent
>> any problem and reduce puzzle complexity. We already do this with
>> libraw included in libkdcraw.
>>
>> Marcel, do you have started to port libface code to libkface ? If no,
>> i can do it today
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2010/10/28 Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister at gmx.net>:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> First of all, since there is now a branch of libface, should I use that branch
>>> or trunk for compiling digikam 2.0 svn?
>>>
>>> Further if I try to compile libkface with any of the above I get an error. I
>>> tried to clean the build dirs but to no avail.
>>>
>>> Is this a local issue or does compiling fail for anyone else as well?
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>> /home/kde-branch/kde/src/libkface/libkface/database.cpp: In member function
>>> ‘bool KFaceIface::Database::updateFaces(QList<KFaceIface::Face>&)’:
>>> /home/kde-branch/kde/src/libkface/libkface/database.cpp:227:42: error: no
>>> match for ‘operator=’ in ‘ids = ((KFaceIface::Database*)this)-
>>>> KFaceIface::Database::d.QExplicitlySharedDataPointer<T>::operator-> [with T =
>>> KFaceIface::Database::DatabasePriv]()-
>>>> KFaceIface::Database::DatabasePriv::libface->libface::LibFace::update((&
>>> faceVec), 1)’
>>> /usr/include/c++/4.5/bits/vector.tcc:156:5: note: candidate is:
>>> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const
>>> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]
>>> /home/kde-branch/kde/src/libkface/libkface/database.cpp: In member function
>>> ‘QList<double>
>>> KFaceIface::Database::recognizeFaces(QList<KFaceIface::Face>&)’:
>>> /home/kde-branch/kde/src/libkface/libkface/database.cpp:274:48: error: no
>>> match for ‘operator=’ in ‘result =
>>> libface::LibFace::recognise(std::vector<libface::Face>*, int)((& faceVec), 1)’
>>> /usr/include/c++/4.5/bits/vector.tcc:156:5: note: candidate is:
>>> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const
>>> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = std::pair<int, double>, _Alloc =
>>> std::allocator<std::pair<int, double> >]
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
> -- Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>