[Digikam-devel] New icon view

[Gilles Caulier]

Compilation is broken under Vista using MinGW (not yet tested with XP,
but it will be a similar pb):

[ 27%] Building CXX object
digikam/digikam/CMakeFiles/digikam.dir/kcategorizedview.obj
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.cpp:1510:
warning: non-inline function 'virtual void KCategorizedView::r
owsInsertedArtifficial(const QModelIndex&, int, int)' is defined after
prior declaration as dllimport: attribute ignored
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.cpp:1610:
warning: non-inline function 'virtual void KCategorizedView::u
pdateGeometries()' is defined after prior declaration as dllimport:
attribute ignored
In file included from
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.cpp:1689:
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.moc:55: error:
definition of static data member 'KCategorizedView::stati
cMetaObject' of dllimport'd class
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.moc:55:
warning: 'KCategorizedView::staticMetaObject' defined locally af
ter being referenced with dllimport linkage
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.cpp: In
destructor `virtual KCategorizedView::~KCategorizedView()':
C:\temp\devel\graphics\digikam\digikam\kcategorizedview.cpp:543:
warning: non-inline function 'virtual KCategorizedView::~KCateg
orizedView()' is defined after prior declaration as dllimport: attribute ignored
make[2]: *** [digikam/digikam/CMakeFiles/digikam.dir/kcategorizedview.obj]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [digikam/digikam/CMakeFiles/digikam.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Gilles

2009/5/16 Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de>:
> Hi,
>
> as of today the main icon view has been replaced with the new implementation
> that has been under development for quite some time.
> I have taken care to go through the old code and port every single feature,
> but there is a lot of new code, so expect bugs and regressions.
> If you are running from current svn and find such a bug until beta1, please
> report it here shortly by mail, no need to flood b.k.o. I have not yet
> tested the majority of features, but will do in the next days.
>
> Issues:
> - Speed. (Talking about the 25000 pictures in the view situation). The idea
> is to make things faster. May things have become slower? They may. I have
> already eliminated performance issues with KCategorizedView. More to come.
> It seems that the view is the limiting factor and the model is well
> optimized.
> - The rate-on-hover feature is waiting to be ported
> - When new images are added in the background, currently the whole album is
> reloaded - incremental update is a missing feature.
>
> Marcel
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>