[Digikam-devel] extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam

[Gilles Caulier]

2009/6/14 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/14 Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de>:
>>> 2009/6/13 Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de>:
>>> >> Result are better than PGF, from speed and space consumption point...
>>> >
>>> > For me results with JPEG are better as well.
>>>
>>> For me, as Mik said, JPEG give artifact on thumbs, with 256x256 size,
>>> especially with image which have geometric forms (wall, houses,
>>> momuments) or high subject contrast as flowers taken in macro mode and
>>> with large zone with same colors ( it's not visible with complex
>>> images composition with high levels of details) . Sound like
>>> anti-aliasing is not visible.
>>>
>>> I tried 90 compression instead 85, but it still visible.
>>>
>>> I cannot see this problem with PGF...
>>
>> I see this dilemma:
>>
>> PGF: quality good, file size good, speed bad            + + -

For PGF, i'm in contact with libpgf team. i will ask if
encoding/decoding performance still possible for the future....

Gilles