[Digikam-devel] digikam build failures on ARM/armel

[Gilles Caulier]

2009/1/12 Luka Renko <lure at kubuntu.org>

> On Saturday 10 January 2009 18:10:24 Luka Renko wrote:
> > -fexceptions -o
> > CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.o - c
> > "/build/buildd/digikam-0.10.0~beta8/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.cpp"
> > /build/buildd/digikam-0.10.0~beta8/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.cpp: In
> > member function 'QPointF
> > Digikam::GeodeticCalculator::destinationGeographicPoint()':
> > /build/buildd/digikam-0.10.0~beta8/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.cpp:179:
> > error: no matching function for call to
> > 'Digikam::GeodeticCalculator::destinationGeographicPoint(qreal*, qreal*)'
> > /build/buildd/digikam-0.10.0~beta8/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.cpp:164:
> > note: candidates are: bool
> > Digikam::GeodeticCalculator::destinationGeographicPoint(double*, double*)
> > /build/buildd/digikam-0.10.0~beta8/libs/dmetadata/geodetictools.cpp:176:
> > note:                 QPointF
> > Digikam::GeodeticCalculator::destinationGeographicPoint()
> >
> >
> > We can probably fix this quickly by just casting qreal -> double in all
> > cases (as it looks like digikam uses mostly double, while Qt code in
> > qreal). The other option could be to use qreal in digikam code, but I am
> > not sure if this would have some side effect (loss of precission)...
>
> Ok, it looks like this is fixed with the following change. Can somebody
> review
> this and tell me if this can be committed to SVN?
>
> Regards,
> Luka
>

It's sound fine for me.

Marcel, your viewpoint ?

Gilles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20090112/9b295cbc/attachment.html>