[Digikam-devel] "Album Type" or "Album Family"

[Arnd Baecker]

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Andi Clemens wrote:

> I would go with "Album Type", but I don't use this feature anyway, so I'm not
> a big help here. I usually only tag images, folders can be found quickly with
> the album search textfield.
>
> Anyay,
> +1 for "Album Type" from me.

Hmm: I never understood these album collections .... ;-)

Much more consistent to me would be the possibility to associate
tags to albums, as discussed in
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133011
However, I am not sure about all consequences of this
(and what changes would be required ...)

Best, Arnd

> Andi
>
> On Friday 02 January 2009 09:47:38 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In KDE3, "Album Collection" term been used to sort album tree view by
> > defined type. It can be considerated a _single tag_ feature for albums. Not
> > that this data are not stored in database.
> >
> > In KDE4, i have used the term "Collections" to design "Root Album Paths".
> > The old KDE3 "Album Collection" concept still here but have been renamed
> > "Album Type" (in setup page only). I need to fix the rest of digiKam
> > strings using "Album Type", for ex in View/Sort Albums, "By Collection"
> > option still present.
> >
> > But i'm not sure if "Album Type" is the right term. Perhaps "Album Family"
> > is better. What do you think about ?
> >
> > Note : In KDE4, "Album Type" data still not stored in database ? Marcel ?
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>