[Digikam-devel] "Album Type" or "Album Family"

[Andi Clemens]

I can live with that ;-)

Andi

On Friday 02 January 2009 11:22:07 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Andi,
>
> Bad news. Album::type() properties already exist. So to not have a confuse
> API, we cannot use AlbumType. I will use AlbumFamily. If someone have a
> better idea, let's me hear...
>
> Gilles
>
> 2009/1/2 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>
>
> > I would go with "Album Type", but I don't use this feature anyway, so I'm
> > not
> > a big help here. I usually only tag images, folders can be found quickly
> > with
> > the album search textfield.
> >
> > Anyay,
> > +1 for "Album Type" from me.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> > On Friday 02 January 2009 09:47:38 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In KDE3, "Album Collection" term been used to sort album tree view by
> > > defined type. It can be considerated a _single tag_ feature for albums.
> >
> > Not
> >
> > > that this data are not stored in database.
> > >
> > > In KDE4, i have used the term "Collections" to design "Root Album
> > > Paths". The old KDE3 "Album Collection" concept still here but have
> > > been renamed "Album Type" (in setup page only). I need to fix the rest
> > > of digiKam strings using "Album Type", for ex in View/Sort Albums, "By
> > > Collection" option still present.
> > >
> > > But i'm not sure if "Album Type" is the right term. Perhaps "Album
> >
> > Family"
> >
> > > is better. What do you think about ?
> > >
> > > Note : In KDE4, "Album Type" data still not stored in database ? Marcel
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > Gilles Caulier
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-devel mailing list
> > Digikam-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel