[Digikam-devel] [Bug 148382] overexposure indication already when	fully "saturated"
    Dik Takken 
    d.h.j.takken at xs4all.nl
       
    Sun Oct  5 13:03:32 BST 2008
    
    
  
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148382
Dik Takken d h j takken xs4all nl changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |d.h.j.takken at xs4all.nl
--- Comment #11 from Dik Takken <d h j takken xs4all nl>  2008-10-05 14:03:30 ---
Overexposure == clipping. When any one channel gets clipped, you have
overexposure.  IMHO, #4 is the way to go.
The same thing is true for clipping on the bottom end. Take a bright color,
like (250,10,10). When this color is darkened by the amount of 50, it changes
to (200,0,0). That color looks quite different, due to clipping. And because it
is a fairly bright color, this form of clipping is very well visible.
Therefore, it should be indicated as being underexposed.
So, I'd say:
if (expoSettings->underExposureIndicator && 
     pix.red() == 0 || pix.green() == 0 || pix.blue() == 0)
-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
    
    
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list