andi.clemens at gmx.net
Mon Dec 1 10:08:15 GMT 2008
On Monday 01 December 2008 11:05:28 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Certainly... Perhaps this code is a side effect from KDE3 port. If we
> > follow Qt4 doc here:
> > http://doc.trolltech.com/4.4/qsplitter.html#restoreState
> > The code do not use base64 transformation... but we can read:
> > "A failure to restore the splitter's layout may result from either
> > invalid or out-of-date data in the supplied byte array."
> > What is it?
Sounds like this broken behavior is normal and expected :-)
I don't really understand that statement...???
More information about the Digikam-devel