[Digikam-devel] [Bug 147429] "and not" option in search function

[Arnd Baecker]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147429         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2007-10-30 19:03 -------
Gerhard, 

of course you are right. This variant was what I referred to
by "otherwise not (easily) obtainable". Any logical statement
can be manipulated similarly to the example. For more complicated
cases it might take some time until one has the logic right ;-)

So this is the only reason I find why an "AND NOT" might be useful.
However, I am not saying that it should be applied in svn.
Presumably the best is to let this wish sleep until it comes up
again (if at all) and reconsider then .. ;-)