[Digikam-devel] Bug#390703: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#390703: ubuntu digikam no longer requires libgphoto-2-2-dev
ach at mpe.mpg.de
Tue Jun 19 20:42:48 BST 2007
On Tuesday, 19. June 2007, Mark Purcell wrote:
> I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer
> need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE
> has been built.
Kubuntu _never_ needed the libgphoto2-dev .la files. This
change is most of the time the only change in the digikam
> I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final
> release package.
Damn :( Have you the time to try the fix described
and following comments?
> Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?
Lure and me discussed it on #kubuntu-devel on freenode. Up to now
we found nothing that explains the difference.
Maybe, while at debconf, you can join #debian-qt-kde on oftc.
Lure and myself are usualy there too.
> +digikam (2:0.9.2~beta2-1ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
> + * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
> + - debian/control: don't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev.
> + Kubuntu's KDE finds the libgphoto plugins without the .la files.
> + - debian/patches/11-add-service-menu-translations.diff:
> + Rework patch to apply - French translation of .desktop file
> + * Added debian/patches/digikam-svn-r669532.diff:
> + Post-Beta2 fix from KDE SVN for preview bug. Closes: KDE #146072.
> + -- Luka Renko <lure at ubuntu.com> Wed, 30 May 2007 19:36:57 +0200
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
-- reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com
More information about the Digikam-devel