[Digikam-devel] digikam 0.9.2-final

[Fabien]

Hi,

Gilles Caulier wrote:
> I have just renamed the tarball file name in SF.net repository

I guess the problem is not the name itself, but the fact that the top 
directory in the tarball is digikam-0.9.2-final instead of "digikam-0.9.2".

Is it too late to upload a new one without "-final" ?

> Gilles
> 
> 2007/6/14, Mark Purcell <msp at debian.org 
> <mailto:msp at debian.org>>:
> 
>      > > So I would appreciate if anybody of you would do the
>     announcements per
>      > > mail.
>      >
>      > hmm, can you change the tarball name? it's a bit ugly for distro
>     packagers.
>      > betaX, rcX are used by them for a pre-release package version so
>     that final
>      > can upgrade them, the word "final" should be left out of package name
>      > instead and that should be managed differently.
> 
>     I second that, please do not release with the word "final".
> 
>     Looking over:
>     http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42641&package_id=34800
>     <http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42641&package_id=34800>
> 
>     None of the previous released versions of digikam 0.9.1, 0.9.0,
>     0.8.2 had the
>     word final as as Angelo states it does make it difficult for distro
>     packagers.
> 
>     But of course the 'final' is on sf.net <http://sf.net> now :-(

--
Fabien