[Digikam-devel] About version numbering schema

[Oliver Dörr]

Hmmm,

i can't see much wrong on the old schema...

We have a list of features, that should be in 1.0. So this means, that 
1.0 will be our major release and it will be available for KDE 4. That's 
fine for me.

Most users gets digiKam trough their distribution and so they don't have 
to care which versions are comatible with KDE versions. All others 
should read release notes.

But i'm only a translator and so it's not my point to decide
Oliver

Fabien schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I sent an email about that a few days ago, see here :
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2007-June/012932.html
>
> <<
> Don't you think it's time to use a new version numbering schema ?
>
> I think digiKam has reached its stability point.
> For most people, when you see a 0.9.x version, it means the software is
> quite close to a stable 1.0 version.
> Using version 0.10 let digiKam looks as an immature software that lacks
> reliability and features. And I definitively think it's not the case !
>
> Creating a 1.0 version would put digiKam under spotlight and that would
> be great...
> I also think it's important to clearly separate kde3 versions and kde4
> version.
>
> This is why I make the following proposal :
>
> - create a 1.0.0 for the next digiKam version (instead of 0.9.2)
> 0.9.3 would be 1.0.1
>
> - use 2.0 for kde4 port
>  >>
>
> Achim and Mikolaj already said they like the idea.
>
> What about others ?
> Gilles, Marcel, Oliver, Arnd, ... ?
>
> Maybe you missed it in the thread :)
>
> --
> Fabien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>