[Digikam-devel] digikam 0.9.2-final

[Mark Purcell]

> > So I would appreciate if anybody of you would do the announcements per
> > mail. 
>
> hmm, can you change the tarball name? it's a bit ugly for distro packagers. 
> betaX, rcX are used by them for a pre-release package version so that final 
> can upgrade them, the word "final" should be left out of package name 
> instead and that should be managed differently. 

I second that, please do not release with the word "final".

Looking over:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42641&package_id=34800

None of the previous released versions of digikam 0.9.1, 0.9.0, 0.8.2 had the 
word final as as Angelo states it does make it difficult for distro 
packagers.

But of course the 'final' is on sf.net now :-(

mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070614/0c6e311a/attachment.sig>