[Digikam-devel] Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

[Mark Purcell]

tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
> I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380.  But you 
> should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better.

John,

Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is now available via unstable?

I can't reproduce and my album size is 11G and digikam takes about 6 seconds to startup.

How would you characterise your albums?

How many G, how many files, all JPEG, mixtures of JPEG, TIFF??

Thanks,
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070710/ece1b91f/attachment.sig>