[Digikam-devel] Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums
msp at debian.org
Tue Jul 10 18:46:45 BST 2007
tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
> I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you
> should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better.
Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is now available via unstable?
I can't reproduce and my album size is 11G and digikam takes about 6 seconds to startup.
How would you characterise your albums?
How many G, how many files, all JPEG, mixtures of JPEG, TIFF??
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Digikam-devel