[Digikam-devel] 0.9.1 release plan...

Angelo Naselli anaselli at linux.it
Mon Feb 5 14:54:11 GMT 2007


Alle 11:42, lunedì 5 febbraio 2007, Caulier Gilles ha scritto:
> Le dimanche 4 février 2007 18:58, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
> > Alle 17:29, domenica 4 febbraio 2007, Caulier Gilles ha scritto:
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > TODO LIST --------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > You can see below all tasks to do before to release 0.9.1-beta1 :
> > >
> > > - Bug 127583: keywords, copyright, photographer info not saved to IPTC
> > > tags :
> >
> > I'd like to port a fix i made in gwenview (printing fuction)
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129948
> > But I don't know if i can do it soon, the patch is simple is the one in
> > document.cpp described into the bug. OTH what i don't know if digikam has
> > image.dotsPerMeterX() and image.dotsPerMeterY() 
> 
> Are you talking about DImg object or Qimage object into printing 
> implementation ?
> 
> DImg do not have this information yet. A QImage converted from a DImg will be 
> not set especially.
> 
> What do you whant to do with image.dotsPerMeterX() and image.dotsPerMeterY() ?
Well to be honest i have to check, because IIRC there are some difference in
the way i implemented it in gv and the the way i ported in digikam to leave its
old implementation.
Anyway the problem reported was concerning the way in which all the kde appls
print images without scaling and with dpi info in them. Just think to the scanned
images for instance. You can get those info from the file (jpeg, png, tiff, ....) and
QImage in my experience didn't.
> > > RELEASE PLAN -------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I propose this release plan
> > >
> > > - 0.9.1-beta1 : 2007-11-02.
> > > - 0.9.1-RC : 2007-18-02.
> > > - 0.9.1-final : 2007-25-02.
> >
> > I know digikam is well tested in svn, but imho it's a bit optimistic
> > a fortnight's cycle of testing for final. OTH I know the days can be
> > postponned during that phase...
> 
> The beta1 release date is fine. Talking with Marcel yesterday by IRC, normally 
> all will be done before this date. 
I'm not against that of course :) I just wanna say that the most use the program
as soon as their distro release the package, so a week is not too much imo.

Cheers,
	Angelo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070205/cc22aedb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list