[Digikam-devel] What do we want to store in the database?

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 08:46:57 BST 2007


2007/8/30, Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker at web.de>:
>
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Julien Narboux wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe it would be easier to write this list on a wiki ?
>
> Marcel already started a wiki some time ago
> http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam+development+discussion
>
> Marcel, should we add all the thoughts there as well
> (including comments ?)
>
> > Here are some other field which may be useful:
>
> > - quantity of blur : maybe this fonctionnality could be added in the
> > future, there exists some algorithm to measure blur. It would be nice to
> > have it to compare a bunch a picture and eliminate those which are out
> > of focused
>
> This is an interesting idea (funnily, I thought about this
> recently as well ;-): There is on "problem": sometimes
> only a small region (e.g. a flower, insect, ...) of an image
> is sharp and all  the rest will be blurred.
> This one get a large value for blur, while it still
> might be a perfect 5-star shot. So essentially
> a local blur indicator might be needed.
> This would require some interestings tests on algorithms ...
> Do you have already some reference to the algorithms to
> measure blur?
>
> ((To me this example just highlights that it would be nice
> to allow for easy additions of new fields in the
> database in the future, i.e. withouth the need to wait for
> a 0.9 to 0.10 transition ...))


This informations come from Makernotes. Look my previous comments about
that...


> >
> > >     - orientation
> > >
> > >
> > > ==> as the same value  than Exif orientation flag
> > >
> > > B.K.O about to find image by photo info is :
> > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146337
> > >
> > >     - GPS:
> > >     - latitude
> > >     - longitude
> > >     - altitude
> > >
> > >
> > - tilt (nb of degrees with regard to horizontal)
> > - orientation (compass)
>
> Yes, this would be nice (Though I am not 100% sure, if this
> has to be searchable?)
> Additional remark:
> This is useful for the KML 2.2 Photoverlay,
> to precisely specify the region to which the photo
> corresponds to, see
>
> http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/kml_tags_beta1.html#photooverlay
> http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/photos.html
> http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2007/08/new_photo_viewer_wit.html
>
> Also, this is of interest in the context of
> gipfel, http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/gipfel.htmlexternal link
> which allows for finding the names of mountains
> or points of interest on a picture.
> (This uses: View direction, Nick angle, Tilt angle, Focal Length,
> Visibility)
>
> > Gilles wrote:
> > > + GPS position description as string. My GPS device (Tom Tom one)
> > > generate a GPX file with this informations for each point in trace. I
> > > will improve GPSSync plugin to extract this srtings, this can be
> usefull.
>
> What additional information is provided in the strings?
>

Like the GPS device have a map (this is a road mapping guide device ), the
GPX trace give me the GPS position of course + a string given informations
about the place, for ex. "near the beach Foo", "At north of Eiffel Tower",
or "At 100m of Foo station". Of course this stings can be backported as a
comment (for ex. IPTC as a location description string).

Gilles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070830/9849a930/attachment.html>


More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list