[Bug 121005] digikam won´t start when the album-path stays on nfs-volume

René Fritz rene at colorcube.de
Tue Aug 15 15:48:16 BST 2006


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121005         




------- Additional Comments From rene colorcube de  2006-08-15 16:48 -------
I'm not shure if it's only a sqlite problem. But also when it is so I agree a message for the user is better than quietly do nothing or just crash.

Anyway, maybe I have a little more information which might help.

I tested with an nfs mount and also (the same album folder) with a samba share mounted with cifs. The behaviour of digikam is the same. I can't say if file locking (and that seems to be the problem with sqlite) is working with samba or not. 

I can work with V. 0.8.x and 0.9b1 having the album on the network mount. Importing images from the camera works, creating album folder and adding comments or tags - no problem.

What's not working is ...

1. to enable the option "Search for new photos on startup" (don't know the exact wording) 

This will bring up a box on startup with a progress bar which goes to 99% and that's it. Nothing happens. Starting digikiam in the shell gives no output. Interestingly this worked once with V.0.8.?. (By the way, would be nice to have an "update album" function to search for new photos.)

Disabling the option makes digikam work again.
~/.kde/share/config/digikamrc:
[General Settings]
Scan At Start=false

2. importing files or folder into the album.

This start a copy process with a normal kde copy box. The box does not change and stays at 0% forever. Surprisingly the files are copied into the right place.


It's said that nfs and sqlite doesn't work, but that's not true. Even digikam works. What's not working are the import function of digikam. This might be related to sqlite, I don't know. In my opinion, sqlite on an nfs share shouldn't make any difference when only one user access the db - it's just slower.
It would be nice if that get fixed in 0.9



More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list