Issue of 25th May is online

danny at commit-digest.org danny at commit-digest.org
Mon Nov 10 08:04:10 UTC 2014 

I would be happy for a new Frameworks category to be added, if you give me a couple of days I will make the required changes to the code.

Thanks,
Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: digest-bounces at kde.org [mailto:digest-bounces at kde.org] On Behalf Of Marta Rybczynska
Sent: 08 November 2014 09:45
To: digest at kde.org
Subject: Re: Issue of 25th May is online

Hello,
Maybe we create a separate Frameworks category? What do you think?

I've started releasing the new digests. Thanks Alex!

Best,
Marta

Quoting Alex Fikl <alexfikl at gmail.com>:

> Hey,
>
> Thanks for the tip for using automated filters! That's gonna come in handy.
>
> 2) I looked a bit in previous issues and the frameworks seem a bit 
> scattered. kcrash is in Development Tools, kapidox is in Utilities, 
> sonnet is in Office, but most of them seem to be in KDE Base. Maybe 
> there should be another area for frameworks, considering that 
> kdepimlibs will be split sometime in the future as well and probably 
> others.
>
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:59 PM,  <danny at commit-digest.org> wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>> 1) Networking Tools seems like a good place for kdeconnect.
>> 2) Frameworks seem like they should go in kdebase (though maybe check 
>> a previous issue to see how they were classified there)
>>
>> (for any of these, feel free to set up an automated filter for future 
>> use!
>> http://enzyme.commit-digest.org/tools/commit-area-filtering/)
>>
>> 3) I often put porting commits in "other" (though I usually go back 
>> and remove porting commits that aren't "significant")
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Danny
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: digest-bounces at kde.org [mailto:digest-bounces at kde.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Alex Fikl
>> Sent: 01 November 2014 08:53
>> To: List for co-ordinating production of the KDE Commit-Digest.
>> Subject: Re: Issue of 25th May is online
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Thanks a lot! Everything seems to be working correctly.
>>
>> I have a few question about the classifications (this is slightly 
>> more complicated apparently :)
>> * I came across kdeconnect and it doesn't have a default category.
>> Where should it go? Networking Tools maybe?
>> * Same for all the frameworks. Should they go in KDE Base?
>> * With all the frameworks work, there are a lot of porting commits 
>> (probably my fault). Which type should they have?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Danny Allen 
>> <danny at commit-digest.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Alex,
>>> As Marta says, you should now be able to see the “Classify” page in 
>>> your Enzyme account.
>>> Ignore the email you may have received about a declined application, 
>>> I rejected the new user account application as you can do it using 
>>> your existing account.
>>>
>>> Anything else, please feel free to ask!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danny
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 28 Oct 2014, at 19:09, Alex Fikl <alexfikl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've been mostly doing reviewing until now (more or less 
>>>> successfully), but I'd like to help with the classifying as well. 
>>>> Is there anything else that needs to be done except applying for it?
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:49 PM,  <danny at commit-digest.org> wrote:
>>>>> If I can start to clear the backlog of commits that need 
>>>>> classifying, would either Marta or someone else be able to 
>>>>> complete the editing part and get some issues published?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Danny
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: marta at rybczynska.net [mailto:marta at rybczynska.net]
>>>>> Sent: 26 October 2014 19:28
>>>>> To: danny at commit-digest.org
>>>>> Cc: 'List for co-ordinating production of the KDE Commit-Digest.'
>>>>> Subject: Re: Issue of 25th May is online
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Danny & all,
>>>>> I'm quite busy at the moment with eV stuff and other things, but 
>>>>> I'm trying to slowly resume the editing part.
>>>>>
>>>>> But.. The review part is working great (thanks to Aleix and 
>>>>> Giacomo), but it blocks at classification. Currently when I want 
>>>>> to release an issue I have to do both classification and editing.
>>>>> The thing with classification is that it has become more 
>>>>> complicated - there are quite many subrepositories that are not 
>>>>> put automatically in a category, so you need to basically look 
>>>>> around. As a result, it becomes 1h at least per issue. If we can 
>>>>> find someone to do the job and/or add some more automation, it 
>>>>> should work much more smoothly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Marta
>>>>>
>>>>> Cytowanie danny at commit-digest.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Marta, all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that the last Commit-Digest to be published was several 
>>>>>> months ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand the “Digest burnout” that can happen – after all, it 
>>>>>> happened to me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is why I created the Enzyme platform so that the production 
>>>>>> could become distributed – however, it has been clear for a long 
>>>>>> time that much of the work for getting the Digest finished up and 
>>>>>> published each week has been done by Marta, which is great when 
>>>>>> she is able to do it, but is a single point of failure in the 
>>>>>> case when she is not able to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we need to find some new people to help out with the Digest?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Marta: do we need a new “editor in chief”, or are you able to 
>>>>>> resume this role?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks for everyone’s work over the past years, it is much 
>>>>>> appreciated!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Danny
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: digest-bounces at kde.org [mailto:digest-bounces at kde.org] On 
>>>>>> Behalf Of Marta Rybczynska
>>>>>> Sent: 24 August 2014 18:31
>>>>>> To: digest at kde.org
>>>>>> Subject: Issue of 25th May is online
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>> Next KDE Commit Digest is online. It includes:
>>>>>> * Amarok implements popular demand to restore scroll location 
>>>>>> when collection filter is cleared; adds a new option to support 
>>>>>> icon-view large thumb size (over 256x256 px).
>>>>>> * Plasma desktop streamlines Comment fields of KCMs by applying 
>>>>>> common language and type-setting to the systemsettings modules in 
>>>>>> kde-workspace.
>>>>>> * Kopete adds support for SOCKS5 proxy in ICQ protocol.
>>>>>> * Umbrello sees work on UML 2.0.
>>>>>> * Krita adds the indexed color filter. Porting to KF5/Qt5 
>>>>>> continues, including massif-visualizer and partitionmanager.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Marta
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digest mailing list
>>>>> Digest at kde.org
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digest mailing list
>>>> Digest at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digest mailing list
>>> Digest at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digest mailing list
>> Digest at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digest mailing list
>> Digest at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest



_______________________________________________
Digest mailing list
Digest at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest

More information about the Digest mailing list