specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

[Roger Pixley]

Noted :) Probably a note in Enzyme itself?

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Danny Allen <danny at commit-digest.org>wrote:

> Yeah, no problem, i'm happy with the distinction between the two and the
> work going on there.
> I'm just thinking aloud about the future documentation requirements for
> Enzyme itself really.
>
> Danny
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Pixley" <skreech2 at gmail.com>
> To: "Danny Allen" <danny at commit-digest.org>
> Cc: "Alexander van Loon" <a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl>, digest at kde.org
> Sent: Friday, 31 December, 2010 3:04:26 AM
> Subject: Re: specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?
>
> With respect Danny the things we are discussing on the Community Wiki are
> really KDE specific I don't think what is a relevant commit is easily
> translateable to any other project. Enzyme things should certainly be on the
> Enzyme wiki but so far nothing we have spoken about is much use to anyone
> but someone interested in KDE.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Danny Allen < danny at commit-digest.org >
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> I don't mind if we use http://community.kde.org or any other wiki to
> develop guidelines in, but i'd like to transfer any "finalised" content to
> https://github.com/dannyakakong/Enzyme/wiki for two reasons:
>
> * Enzyme should remain project-independent (even though the main - and only
> so far - user is KDE)
> * I've built nice integration of the wiki pages straight into Enzyme, and I
> don't want to create another system at this time
>
> But anyway, good work guys! (i'll add my own thoughts to the wiki soon too)
>
> The EtherPad thing isn't as easy to get setup on, but KDE does have an
> install running at http://notes-dev.kde.org/ (not that i'm advocating
> using it :))
>
> Cheers,
> Danny
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Please take a look at
> http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest_Guidelines
> > > everyone. Danny advised to use Etherpad, but they closed up shop, I
> > > assumed it was okay to use the KDE Community Wiki as well.
> > >
> > > Based on what I’ve heard from Danny and this list, I’ve added a few
> > > lines to the first paragraph and I added two criteria for exclusion of
> > > reviews. Please comment here and change it on the wiki please.
> >
> > The original CD Guidelines were written by me (based on my experience
> > with commit messages). I like your changes and additions. Thanks!
> >
> > Will we use the internal Enzyme Wiki or the Community Wiki for
> > documentation purposes? I feel that using KDE Community Wiki might be
> > the more appropriate place.
> >
> > Best regards from winter-wonderland Hannover,
> > Marco
>
> I agree that the Community Wiki might be a more appropriate place for the
> sake
> of transparency and because of the Commit Digest’s relation to KDE. I
> didn’t
> consciously choose it for this reason though. Danny pointed to the wiki
> page
> on Github in his previous e-mail, I merely chose the KDE Community Wiki
> because I didn’t want to register another account with Github (I already
> have
> two pages filled with user names and passwords to remember lying around).
> Anyway, glad to hear you agree with me on the addition to the guidelines.
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digest/attachments/20110102/262e6730/attachment.htm