Documentation update and questions

Danny Allen danny at commit-digest.org
Wed Feb 23 10:24:40 CET 2011


I like your second idea about using extracts from their own publications, especially when we have no content ourselves.
I've done this occasionally in the past with blog posts for instance - so feel free to do this if you see any really good content.

Just so I know, what other Digests / similar things are out there?
I've seen the Amarok Weekly thing, are there any other regular ones?

Danny


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Pixley" <skreech2 at gmail.com>
To: "Danny Allen" <danny at commit-digest.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February, 2011 9:14:04 AM
Subject: Re: Documentation update and questions

Yeah I was thinking that as well. I didn't mean to say we should not cover the areas. But for obvious reasons they can go into a lot more detail than we can about things. I was just saying we could have a link from Commit Digest to them if someone wanted to see more of what they were doing (alternatively we could ask them if we can use extracts from their postings as lead in articles. 


On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Danny Allen < danny at commit-digest.org > wrote: 


Hi Roger, 
I'd like to keep the Commit-Digest as a canonical and complete source of KDE activity and history, so I think we should just continue as we are :) 

Cheers, 
Danny 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Pixley" < skreech2 at gmail.com > 
To: digest at kde.org 
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February, 2011 3:35:28 AM 
Subject: Re: Documentation update and questions 

Sure I just went in and added the link to the site yesterday in case someone is not familiar with 
the site. 

A few other projects in KDE have their own mini Commit Digest. Would it make sense for us to 
simply link to them instead of duplicating effort? 



_______________________________________________ 
Digest mailing list 
Digest at kde.org 
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest 



More information about the Digest mailing list