specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

Alexander van Loon a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl
Wed Dec 29 16:50:15 CET 2010


On Wednesday 29 December 2010 14:48:06 Marco Krohn wrote:
> Hi Alex, all,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Alexander van Loon
> 
> <a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl> wrote:
> > Please take a look at http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest_Guidelines
> > everyone. Danny advised to use Etherpad, but they closed up shop, I
> > assumed it was okay to use the KDE Community Wiki as well.
> > 
> > Based on what I’ve heard from Danny and this list, I’ve added a few
> > lines to the first paragraph and I added two criteria for exclusion of
> > reviews. Please comment here and change it on the wiki please.
> 
> The original CD Guidelines were written by me (based on my experience
> with commit messages). I like your changes and additions. Thanks!
> 
> Will we use the internal Enzyme Wiki or the Community Wiki for
> documentation purposes? I feel that using KDE Community Wiki might be
> the more appropriate place.
> 
> Best regards from winter-wonderland Hannover,
>   Marco

I agree that the Community Wiki might be a more appropriate place for the sake 
of transparency and because of the Commit Digest’s relation to KDE.  I didn’t 
consciously choose it for this reason though. Danny pointed to the wiki page 
on Github in his previous e-mail,  I merely chose the KDE Community Wiki 
because I didn’t want to register another account with Github (I already have 
two pages filled with user names and passwords to remember lying around). 
Anyway, glad to hear you agree with me on the addition to the guidelines.


More information about the Digest mailing list