Kexi 3.0 release is coming
Jaroslaw Staniek
staniek at kde.org
Mon Oct 3 17:05:02 BST 2016
On 3 October 2016 at 12:21, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
> On Monday, 3 October 2016 12:14:21 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 3 October 2016 at 12:06, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>
> wrote:
> > > On Monday, 3 October 2016 12:02:14 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > We're close to the 3.0 release. I plan to create tarballs today.
> > > >
> > > > Maintenance 3.0 branches have been created for Kexi projects
> > > > (kexi/kdb/kproperty/kreport git) already.
> > >
> > > We should finalize the move of the libraries outside of playground
> (which
> > > requires anyway passing through kdereview). We don't usually track
> stable
> > > branches of translations for playground modules (if it has releases,
> it's
> > > not
> > > playground).
> >
> > Good,
> > I remember I had a review like this when we had some time to discuss:
> > https://phabricator.kde.org/D2659.
> > I see no points against the move, just you may remember we were not
> really
> > sure the move is good idea at the moment or needed:
> > https://phabricator.kde.org/D2659#49459
>
> I did not wrote that the move is not needed. I was commenting about the
> final
> destination.
> If we put aside the destination, moving is required as "playground" and
> "stable branches" don't mix according our rules.
>
> The step about "moving to kdereview" is not new and it is the usual rule
> that
> should (have) happen(ed) like in other similar cases, again regardless of
> the
> destination.
>
> > Would you (or anyone else) be able to assist me in the move so we're
> ready
> > for the release as planned? I did not allocate any resources for exactly
> > this task today...
>
> You can release for the current, but we can't create the translation
> branches
> for the stable branch until this is settled. So if you want to release, I
> would say (but I'm not part of release-team, which is not in CC either),
> release today but then allocate the time to move stuff around.
>
>
Thanks Luigi
OK with doing that later then.
Could you look at to tell me what parts of https://phabricator.kde.org/D2916
are OK and what not yet? Probably especially the stable_kf5=3.0 values.
If there's anything documented feel free to share a checklist for the
'kdereview' task.
>
>
>
--
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek
KDE:
: A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators
: and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org
Calligra Suite:
: A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org
Kexi:
: A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi
Qt Certified Specialist:
: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20161003/7ef6e673/attachment.htm>
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list