rng2cpp.cpp build fail with qt5.5
Treeve Jelbert
treeve at scarlet.be
Thu May 28 20:17:02 BST 2015
On Thu, 28 May 2015 21:00:17 +0200 (CEST), Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
>> Hi Treeve,
>>
>> thanks for reporting the error and working on a patch :)
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015, 13:31:29 schrieb Treeve Jelbert:
>>> thanks, the following diff fixes it
>>> diff --git a/devtools/rng2cpp/rng2cpp.cpp
>>> b/devtools/rng2cpp/rng2cpp.cpp
>>> index 3dc3214..de65ac4 100644
>>> --- a/devtools/rng2cpp/rng2cpp.cpp
>>> +++ b/devtools/rng2cpp/rng2cpp.cpp
>>> @@ -23,12 +23,10 @@
>>> #include <QtGlobal>
>>> #include <QSharedPointer>
>>> #include <QStringList>
>>> +#include <QSet>
>>> +#include <QVector>
>>
>> Aha, this is why there was an offset of +2 in the build log you
>> posted :)
>> But, why did you add those two lines? Are they left overs from some
>> experiment, or do you think they are needed to fix this build problem
>> you reported?
>
> I think the extra includes might be what does the trick: the Qt
> people removed some transitive #includes in the latest Qt5, blithely
> disregarding that that'd break code all over the world.
>
the includes were my first attempt.
that reduced the number of erros, but the compile still failed.
>>
>>> -#if QT_VERSION < 0x040800
>>> -# define assert(cond, what) (Q_ASSERT_X(cond, "",
>>> qPrintable(QString(what))))
>>> -#else
>>> -# define assert(cond, what) (Q_ASSERT_X(cond, "",
>>> qPrintable(what)))
>>> -#endif
>>> +# define assert(cond, what) Q_ASSERT_X(cond, "",
>>> qPrintable(what))
>>>
>>> static const QString ns = "writeodf";
>>
>> Can you explain why this fixes it? Is it because QT_VERSION no
>> longer works with Qt 5.5.0, or is it the removed outer () in the
>> replacement the culprit? Why exactly did it fail before? Can you tell
>> how all the macros are resolved in the end with Qt 5.5.0
there was no point in testing for qt-4 versions in frameworks code.
The important change was removing a pair of brackets.
Without that change, this morning's code failed. It now builds.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Friedrich
>> _______________________________________________
>> calligra-devel mailing list
>> calligra-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list