GPL Linking exception or transformation to LGPL?

[Elvis Stansvik]

2015-06-15 12:55 GMT+02:00 Christophe Conil <christophe.conil at gmail.com>:

> Hi Jos, Jaroslaw and Alexander,
>
> First, thank you very much for the fast and kind answers!
> I didn't knew about the possibility of the GPL to use the code in my
> own executable, thanks for spotting that! I guess this solves my
> question: I'm indeed not planning to redistribute the executable (at
> least for now).
>
> As soon as I get a stable and clean implementation of the library,
> I'll come back to you for integration purpose. Still, as you pointed
> it, it probably makes sense to unify the licenses of the listed files.
>
> Attached you'll find the complete list of contributors who worked on
> them. If you want, I can try to contact individually the developers
> who worked on those files and
> propose them an alternative license for a packaging into a library. In
> this case, what should be the proposed license ? LGPLv2.1 or later?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Christophe
>
> Additional note: I didn't receive the responses to my original mail,
> since I was not part of the mailing list. I got lucky since I checked
> the online archive. Is this a wanted behaviour?
>

It is normal behavior. Your original mail ended up in the moderation queue
since you were not subscribed, I had to let it through.

To receive mail sent to the list you must be subscribed. Or you could
request that respondents always send you a copy when they reply.

Cheers,
Elvis


> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20150615/bf6cb133/attachment.htm>