GPL Linking exception or transformation to LGPL?

[Jaroslaw Staniek]

On 15 June 2015 at 08:55, Alexander Potashev <aspotashev at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-06-15 9:44 GMT+03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek <staniek at kde.org>:
>> - as Jos has said unless the code is distributed, no changes have
>> (even in GPL) to be published; we're not using AGPL
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I also did not get why AGPL was mentioned.
>
> This following applies here:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#UnreleasedMods
> (Or you can read the GPLv2 license and easily come to the same conclusion.)

to state that if we wanted to prohibity the use case we'd use AGPL and
we're not doing this :)


>
> --
> Alexander Potashev
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel



-- 
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek

KDE:
: A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators
: and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org
Calligra Suite:
: A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org
Kexi:
: A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi
Qt Certified Specialist:
: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek