Let's use 3.0 only for next real release (was: Re: After 2.9.7)

C. Boemann cbo at boemann.dk
Thu Aug 27 15:58:37 BST 2015


+ 1

On Thursday 27 August 2015 14:22:19 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 09:57:32 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> > I think that the frameworks branch is now ready to be called 3.0. It's
> > obviously not ready to release to end users, but we should make it the
> > new master. But let's call it the frameworks branch for now.
> 
> +1 for making frameworks master now :)
> 
> Proposal:
> Let's change and not (ab)use the "3.0" version label for the current
> development milestone in the frameworks branch where initial port could be
> declared done-with-no-big-regressions, and thus also not do the first
> release as "3.1".
> Let's instead use the "3.0" version for the first release. And simply keep
> the current 3.0 Alpha tag on the frameworks branch.
> 
> Not need to dump "3.0" in interface to public and waste time/space in the
> release notes, chats and interviews/articles on where 3.0 is and why 3.0 was
> skipped, where instead features could and should be highlighted :) Unless
> anyone can tell if there could be a great promotion spin done out of that?
> ;)
> 
> Internally we have been talking about 3.0 as switch-feature-development-to-
> frameworks milestone and 3.1 as first-qt5-based release, but well, we are
> smart contributors and can quickly adapt tag labels, right? :)
> 
> Objections?
> 
> Cheers
> Friedrich
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel




More information about the calligra-devel mailing list