Merging the biblio code to 2.7 or 2.8

[Smit Patel]

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek <staniek at kde.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> Before merging the biblio code to 2.7 or 2.8 (Smit, do you plan to
> have the bibliography improvements for 2.7 or 2.8?):
>
No. There are some UX improvements I have in mind for database ui, but not
for 2.7 or 2.8

>
> KexiTableViewColumn and KexiTableViewData to calligradb'
> (https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110162/) is in 2.7 already.
> Before pushing the 'Use KexiDB's TableViewData in the biblio table
> model' code to 2.7 or 2.8 (https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110163/)
> we need to have the code from kexidb-in-biblio-staniek branch merged
> into 2.7 or 2.8.
>
> Just to show how Biblio branches have diverges from 2.7 or 2.8:
> In kexidb-in-biblio-smit:
> % git cherry calligra/2.7 -v | wc -l
> 65
>
> In kexidb-in-biblio-staniek:
>
> % git cherry calligra/2.7 -v|wc -l
> 74
> % git diff calligra/2.7|wc -l
> 5389
>
> It's in "simple case just working" state for me, e.g. I didn't touch
> any UX areas. So any further contributions from me would realistically
> go to 2.8.
> What are your plans, Smit?
>
> OTOH I'd like to see the code alive at least in master this year, and
> before in a new cleaned up feature branch.
>
> I see one practical solution: git-squash to reduce number of commits,
> especially that certain solutions/patches were replaced by others
> (e.g. use of QtSql vs kexidb).
>
> --
> regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek
>  Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org
>  Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org
>  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20130505/989b83cc/attachment.htm>