2.6.0 tag is set on...

[C. Boemann]

On Monday 04 February 2013 19:12:22 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Monday, February 04, 2013 19:04:41 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Monday, February 04, 2013 18:29:45 C. Boemann wrote:
> > 
> > But there is something you are missing: If there was such an important
> > bug and you didn't feel comfortable reenabling at that time we could
> > instead have requested a move of the tagging one day forward. That would
> > have given time to test the fix better and even re-fix it if more
> > problems had been discovered.
> > 
> > This is what would have happened if you had discovered a similarly
> > important bug in an area that you were responsible for. And in fact
> > almost anywhere in Calligra, I'm willing to bet.
> 
> I realized afterwards that this could be seen as an accusation against
> boemann.  This is not what I mean, and I'm sorry for being unclear.
> 
> What I actually meant was that we had crashes before which then led to
> delays, shorter or longer. It wasn't meant to single out anybody.
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Well accusation or not, I'd plead guilty. I don't care enough for missing this 
feature to request a postponement. But yes that would have been the right 
thing to do, and I apologize. As we both know It was late when the fix was 
there and in the morning at 10 Cyrille was already at work. I really had the 
best of intentions to pick up on it at that time, and as you said would 
probably have protested louder had it it been one of the things I had helped 
develop.

So I'm sorry